Section 196 of 440

Complete canonical tutorial. This reader section contains the same teaching body as PWR-013 · Reactive strength. Open the Power dossier.

PWR-013 · SUPERVISED full tutorial

Rebound quickly from a small supervised hop while keeping landing control

Reactive strength is the ability to switch rapidly from landing force to take-off force in a declared rebound. This lesson teaches a provider-controlled low-amplitude bilateral pogo hop on a force plate: establish a stable landing first, keep the trunk tall, contact through the forefoot and whole foot, rebound without a deep squat and stop when contact time, height or alignment deteriorates. The provider controls clearance, hop height, repetitions, rest and whether drop jumps are ever appropriate.

What you will produceThe learner completes one short provider-set series of bilateral rebounds with consistent contact time, jump height and alignment, then stops on the first control failure.
Method7 numbered Power-specific steps
Practice authorityFull method with qualified supervision where stated

1 · Permission and limits

Know exactly what you may do

You may

  • Reactive strength: Complete a provider-set low jump, land on both marked feet and hold for two seconds with hips and knees flexed. Stand tall with feet on the marks, ankles ready and arms in the declared position. Keep the gaze forward.
  • During an authorised attempt, On landing, allow the whole foot to load while ankles, knees and hips flex slightly, then push away promptly without a deep squat. End the set when contact becomes clearly longer, height falls outside the band, alignment breaks or symptoms appear; step out and settle rather than forcing one more hop.
  • Keep each rebound linked to its contact time, height and alignment result, and record the exact surface, footwear and stopping contact.

Qualified help is required for

  • Review ankle, knee and landing readiness and confirm that the force plate or marked surface can support a short, low-amplitude rebound series.
  • Select the rebound task, surface, hop height, footwear, contacts, rest, force-plate method and any progression toward drop jumps.
  • Use live observation or force data to keep the hop small and fast, correct a deep knee-dominant rebound and end the series as soon as contact time, height or alignment leaves its corridor.

Never do this from the page alone

  • Step or jump from a box, add external load or continue repeated contacts without explicit provider instruction and a protected landing area.
  • Do not progress to higher hops, unilateral contacts or drop jumps from this page or after one good rebound series.
  • Terminate the set for lengthening contact, falling height, knee or foot misalignment, pain, loss of balance or a heavy uncontrolled landing.

2 · Get ready

Gather what you need and check the starting conditions

What you need

  • Force plate or validated contact-time and jump-height system
  • Flat resilient non-slip surface with foot marks
  • Video view of trunk, knees and feet
  • Stable support outside the landing zone
  • A rebound sheet showing task, surface, footwear, contact number, ground-contact time, jump height, alignment flag, stopping reason and invalid contacts.

Before you start

  • Demonstrate a quiet two-foot landing and hold balance for two seconds before repeated rebound work.
  • Report recent tendon, bone, knee, ankle or back symptoms and any long break from jumping.
  • Agree on contact count and the exact stop rule for height loss, longer contact or alignment error.
  • Mark the take-off and landing area and rehearse one quiet, low landing. Start the rebound series only when the learner can stay on the marks without stepping, collapsing or reaching for support.
  • Rehearse the tall ready posture, a quiet landing and one small rebound before starting the provider-limited contact series.

3 · The method

Follow these steps in order

  1. Earn the landing first

    Complete a provider-set low jump, land on both marked feet and hold for two seconds with hips and knees flexed.

    Why: Repeated rebound is inappropriate when one landing is not controlled.

    Check: The learner stays on the marks without a step or collapse.

  2. Set the rebound posture

    Stand tall with feet on the marks, ankles ready and arms in the declared position. Keep the gaze forward.

    Why: A repeatable start controls arm and trunk contributions.

    Check: Feet, arms and trunk match the setup image.

  3. Use a small first hop

    Rise only to the provider-set low height and return to the same marks; do not chase maximum height.

    Why: The first contact should establish rhythm, not create an overload.

    Check: The first landing is quiet, centred and within the target height range.

  4. Rebound from the ankle-led contact

    On landing, allow the whole foot to load while ankles, knees and hips flex slightly, then push away promptly without a deep squat.

    Why: A deep, slow countermovement changes the task from short-contact reactive work.

    Check: Contact remains brief and the trunk does not fold.

  5. Keep contacts aligned

    Track knees in line with feet and keep each contact on the marks. Do not let one leg take over or the feet drift.

    Why: Drift and collapse show loss of a repeatable rebound pattern.

    Check: Video shows centred contacts and similar left-right timing.

  6. Stop at the first failed rebound

    End the set when contact becomes clearly longer, height falls outside the band, alignment breaks or symptoms appear; step out and settle rather than forcing one more hop.

    Why: Technique failure is the endpoint, not exhaustion.

    Check: No extra contacts occur after the first stop criterion.

  7. Calculate and interpret RSI

    For valid contacts, divide jump height by ground-contact time using consistent units and report height and contact time alongside the ratio.

    Why: The same ratio can hide different height-contact strategies.

    Check: The record retains all three values and the exact hop condition.

4 · Worked example

See the whole method used once

Scenario

A strength coach prescribes five low bilateral rebounds on a force plate, hands on hips, with a 12–16 cm height band and a stop if contact exceeds 0.25 s.

Walkthrough

  1. The learner first demonstrates two stable single landings.
  2. Contacts one to three show 0.21, 0.20 and 0.21 s with heights of 14, 15 and 14 cm.
  3. Contact four lasts 0.27 s and the knees collapse inward, so the learner stops and does not perform contact five.
  4. The coach calculates RSI only for the first three valid contacts and keeps height and time visible.
  5. After rest, the coach ends the session rather than adding a replacement set because the predeclared failure occurred.

Result

The valid series is three controlled contacts, not five. The mean valid RSI describes this low hands-on-hips rebound; it does not establish repeated-sprint endurance, sprint speed or safe drop-jump capacity.

5 · Right and wrong

Compare correct or safer execution with the common wrong version

Right and wrong comparison
MomentRight / saferWrong / riskierWhy it matters
Entry levelShow a stable landing before repeated rebound.Begin with a box drop to discover whether landing is adequate.Box height adds unearned impact demand.
Contact: Reactive strength checkpointUse a small prompt rebound with slight joint flexion.Sink into a deep squat and pause.The task becomes a slower countermovement jump.
Set endpointStop at first height, contact-time or alignment failure.Continue until exhaustion to improve the score.Extra poor contacts add risk and corrupt the measure.
RSI: Reactive strength checkpointReport height and contact time beside the ratio.Report only the ratio and hide how it was achieved.Identical ratios can represent different strategies.
Transfer: Reactive strength checkpointCall it performance in this rebound fixture.Use it as proof of sprint or repeated-sprint ability.Reactive rebound and sprint endurance are different constructs.

6 · Common mistakes

Spot the error and apply the correction

Common mistakes and corrections
MistakeFix
The learner chases height and lengthens contact.Reinstate the provider's height band and prioritise the declared contact task.
A deep knee bend replaces the ankle-led rebound.Lower the hop height and rehearse two low contacts before another set.
Invalid contacts remain in the mean RSI.Apply the contact-time, height and alignment rules before calculation.
The series continues after inward knee collapse.End at the first failed contact and review the cause.
Repeated-sprint evidence is presented as rebound evidence.Keep the dossier mismatch explicit and use direct RSI sources for this method.

7 · Practice

Turn the steps into a usable skill

First session

  1. Provider checks readiness and teaches a stable single landing.
  2. Practise two low hops separated by a full reset.
  3. Complete one three-contact familiarisation series.
  4. After full rest, complete one short measured series with a declared failure rule.
  5. Review contact time, jump height, RSI and alignment for each valid contact.

Repeat plan

The qualified provider controls contact count, height, surfaces, rest and weekly plyometric exposure. Drop height, unilateral work or external load are new higher-risk tasks and require separate teaching and clearance.

Progress when

  • Every rebound returns to the same foot marks with stable alignment.
  • Height and contact time remain inside the declared bands for the full short series.
  • Symptoms and next-day response remain acceptable under the provider's rule.

Do not progress when

  • Contact time lengthens, jump height falls or alignment fails before the planned endpoint.
  • Pain, swelling, stiffness, fear or asymmetry appears during or after the session.
  • The learner needs a higher drop or more contacts to make the ratio look better.

8 · Check the result

Measure what changed

Jump height divided by ground-contact time for valid short-contact rebounds, with height, time and alignment reported

How: Use the same force plate, arm rule, hop or drop condition, foot marks and validity bands; calculate RSI only after excluding failed contacts.

Good result: All contacts in the declared short series meet height, contact-time and alignment rules with stable symptoms and a consistent ratio.

This does not prove: It does not prove sprint performance, repeated-sprint endurance, injury prevention or readiness for higher drop heights.

Self-check

  • Can you demonstrate a stable landing before rebounding?
  • Did you stop at the first failed contact?
  • Can you calculate RSI and still show height and contact time?
  • Can you explain why this is not repeated-sprint endurance?

9 · Stop, adapt or get help

Keep the safety boundary practical

Stop and get help

  • Stop for sharp tendon, bone, knee, ankle or back pain, a pop, swelling, giving way or inability to land normally.
  • End the series on the first contact-time, height or alignment failure; do not finish the count for completeness.
  • Abandon rebound contacts after focal tendon or bone pain, swelling, instability or a visibly protective landing, and let the qualified provider decide whether impact testing remains suitable.

Accessibility and adaptations

  • Use a provider-selected supported heel raise, rapid seated push or non-flight stretch-shortening task when hopping is not appropriate and label it separately.
  • Use high-contrast foot marks and visual or tactile start-stop cues without reducing the landing area.
  • Teach the landing and rebound shape with a side-view demonstration, tactile position targets or short sound cues, without relaxing the contact-time and landing-quality criteria.

10 · Evidence and limits

Why these instructions are here

  1. primary research

    The cited study evaluates a modified reactive strength index based on jump height and time to take-off; that value should not be substituted silently for contact-time RSI.

    Using the reactive strength index modified to evaluate plyometric performance
  2. primary research

    Drop-jump and hopping RSI did not show a consistent relationship with sprint measures in one primary study, limiting transfer claims.

    Influence of Reactive and Maximum Strength Indicators on Sprint Performance

Limits

  • The current canonical evidence register for PWR-013 is bound to repeated-sprint studies; those sources do not substantiate this rebound method.
  • RSI depends on the hop/drop condition, technique and device.
  • A higher RSI is not permission to add box height, contacts or load.
Open the complete canonical research register
  1. Primary empirical supportLimiting / contrary
    Performance and physiological responses to repeated-sprint exercise: a novel multiple-set approach

    Fabio R. Serpiello; Michael J. McKenna; Nigel K. Stepto; David J. Bishop; Robert J. Aughey · 2011 · Primary research

  2. Primary empirical supportLimiting / contrary
    The Effect of Speed Endurance Versus Core Training on The Repeated Sprint Ability of Youth Male Soccer Players - A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Olavo Maciel; Ricardo Martins; Fábio Y. Nakamura; Pedro Figueiredo; José Afonso; Ivan Baptista · 2024 · Primary research

  3. Limiting / contraryOfficial boundary context
    WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour

    World Health Organization · 2020 · Official guidance

Read the complete evidence interpretation on the Power dossier.

Tutorial delivery controls

Learn, adapt, troubleshoot and resume

Estimated timeEstimated 11 min reading; practical time is provider-set
DifficultyIntermediate
EquipmentSpecialist equipment
SpaceRoom-scale practice space
Method qualityComprehensive10 of 10 structural checks present. Automated method-readiness band; human editorial sign-off is separate.
Evidence contextG4; Focused research depthScientific support is evaluated separately from teaching-method structure.
Editorial reviewPending manual sign-offNo human approval is claimed until reviewer, date and content hash are recorded.
Your tutorial progress0 of 7 steps complete
0 of 7 steps complete
Download learner worksheet

Progress is saved only in this browser on this device.

Step-by-step learner mode

Each activity includes its success check, a nearby accessible alternative and an “I’m stuck” correction path. Alternatives preserve the target where possible; when they change the task, Titan labels them as related rather than equivalent.

01

Earn the landing first

Complete a provider-set low jump, land on both marked feet and hold for two seconds with hips and knees flexed.

Why this step exists

Repeated rebound is inappropriate when one landing is not controlled.

Success check

The learner stays on the marks without a step or collapse.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “Complete a provider-set low jump, land on both marked feet and hold for two seconds with hips and knees flexed.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: The result from “Complete a provider-set low jump, land on both marked feet and hold for two seconds with hips and knees flexed.” does not yet meet this declared check: The learner stays on the marks without a step or collapse.

    Correction: Return to the start of “Earn the landing first”, reduce complexity or pace, and repeat only the part needed to satisfy: “The learner stays on the marks without a step or collapse.”

Stop / get help: Stop for sharp tendon, bone, knee, ankle or back pain, a pop, swelling, giving way or inability to land normally.

02

Set the rebound posture

Stand tall with feet on the marks, ankles ready and arms in the declared position. Keep the gaze forward.

Why this step exists

A repeatable start controls arm and trunk contributions.

Success check

Feet, arms and trunk match the setup image.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “Stand tall with feet on the marks, ankles ready and arms in the declared position. Keep the gaze forward.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: Repeated-sprint evidence is presented as rebound evidence.

    Correction: Keep the dossier mismatch explicit and use direct RSI sources for this method.

Stop / get help: Stop for sharp tendon, bone, knee, ankle or back pain, a pop, swelling, giving way or inability to land normally.

03

Use a small first hop

Rise only to the provider-set low height and return to the same marks; do not chase maximum height.

Why this step exists

The first contact should establish rhythm, not create an overload.

Success check

The first landing is quiet, centred and within the target height range.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “Rise only to the provider-set low height and return to the same marks; do not chase maximum height.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: The result from “Rise only to the provider-set low height and return to the same marks; do not chase maximum height.” does not yet meet this declared check: The first landing is quiet, centred and within the target height range.

    Correction: Return to the start of “Use a small first hop”, reduce complexity or pace, and repeat only the part needed to satisfy: “The first landing is quiet, centred and within the target height range.”

Stop / get help: Stop for sharp tendon, bone, knee, ankle or back pain, a pop, swelling, giving way or inability to land normally.

04

Rebound from the ankle-led contact

On landing, allow the whole foot to load while ankles, knees and hips flex slightly, then push away promptly without a deep squat.

Why this step exists

A deep, slow countermovement changes the task from short-contact reactive work.

Success check

Contact remains brief and the trunk does not fold.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “On landing, allow the whole foot to load while ankles, knees and hips flex slightly, then push away promptly without a deep squat.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: A deep knee bend replaces the ankle-led rebound.

    Correction: Lower the hop height and rehearse two low contacts before another set.

Stop / get help: Stop for sharp tendon, bone, knee, ankle or back pain, a pop, swelling, giving way or inability to land normally.

05

Keep contacts aligned

Track knees in line with feet and keep each contact on the marks. Do not let one leg take over or the feet drift.

Why this step exists

Drift and collapse show loss of a repeatable rebound pattern.

Success check

Video shows centred contacts and similar left-right timing.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “Track knees in line with feet and keep each contact on the marks. Do not let one leg take over or the feet drift.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: The result from “Track knees in line with feet and keep each contact on the marks. Do not let one leg take over or the feet drift.” does not yet meet this declared check: Video shows centred contacts and similar left-right timing.

    Correction: Return to the start of “Keep contacts aligned”, reduce complexity or pace, and repeat only the part needed to satisfy: “Video shows centred contacts and similar left-right timing.”

Stop / get help: Stop for sharp tendon, bone, knee, ankle or back pain, a pop, swelling, giving way or inability to land normally.

06

Stop at the first failed rebound

End the set when contact becomes clearly longer, height falls outside the band, alignment breaks or symptoms appear; step out and settle rather than forcing one more hop.

Why this step exists

Technique failure is the endpoint, not exhaustion.

Success check

No extra contacts occur after the first stop criterion.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “End the set when contact becomes clearly longer, height falls outside the band, alignment breaks or symptoms appear; step out and settle rather than forcing one more hop.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: The learner chases height and lengthens contact.

    Correction: Reinstate the provider's height band and prioritise the declared contact task.

  2. Possible snag: The series continues after inward knee collapse.

    Correction: End at the first failed contact and review the cause.

Stop / get help: Stop for sharp tendon, bone, knee, ankle or back pain, a pop, swelling, giving way or inability to land normally.

07

Calculate and interpret RSI

For valid contacts, divide jump height by ground-contact time using consistent units and report height and contact time alongside the ratio.

Why this step exists

The same ratio can hide different height-contact strategies.

Success check

The record retains all three values and the exact hop condition.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “For valid contacts, divide jump height by ground-contact time using consistent units and report height and contact time alongside the ratio.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: Invalid contacts remain in the mean RSI.

    Correction: Apply the contact-time, height and alignment rules before calculation.

Stop / get help: Stop for sharp tendon, bone, knee, ankle or back pain, a pop, swelling, giving way or inability to land normally.

Correct versus incorrect execution

These accessible process diagrams are built from the tutorial’s own right/wrong teaching. They are not anatomical illustrations and do not add technique beyond the canonical tutorial.

Entry level — Box height adds unearned impact demand.
PWR-013 correct and incorrect comparison: Entry levelEntry level. Correct or safer: Show a stable landing before repeated rebound.. Wrong or riskier: Begin with a box drop to discover whether landing is adequate.. Why: Box height adds unearned impact demand.SITUATIONEntry levelCORRECT / SAFERShow a stable landing before repeated rebound.WRONG / RISKIERBegin with a box drop to discover whetherlanding is adequate.YESNO
Correct / safer

Show a stable landing before repeated rebound.

Wrong / riskier

Begin with a box drop to discover whether landing is adequate.

Contact: Reactive strength checkpoint — The task becomes a slower countermovement jump.
PWR-013 correct and incorrect comparison: Contact: Reactive strength checkpointContact: Reactive strength checkpoint. Correct or safer: Use a small prompt rebound with slight joint flexion.. Wrong or riskier: Sink into a deep squat and pause.. Why: The task becomes a slower countermovement jump.SITUATIONContact: Reactivestrength checkpointCORRECT / SAFERUse a small prompt rebound with slight jointflexion.WRONG / RISKIERSink into a deep squat and pause.YESNO
Correct / safer

Use a small prompt rebound with slight joint flexion.

Wrong / riskier

Sink into a deep squat and pause.

Set endpoint — Extra poor contacts add risk and corrupt the measure.
PWR-013 correct and incorrect comparison: Set endpointSet endpoint. Correct or safer: Stop at first height, contact-time or alignment failure.. Wrong or riskier: Continue until exhaustion to improve the score.. Why: Extra poor contacts add risk and corrupt the measure.SITUATIONSet endpointCORRECT / SAFERStop at first height, contact-time or alignmentfailure.WRONG / RISKIERContinue until exhaustion to improve the score.YESNO
Correct / safer

Stop at first height, contact-time or alignment failure.

Wrong / riskier

Continue until exhaustion to improve the score.

RSI: Reactive strength checkpoint — Identical ratios can represent different strategies.
PWR-013 correct and incorrect comparison: RSI: Reactive strength checkpointRSI: Reactive strength checkpoint. Correct or safer: Report height and contact time beside the ratio.. Wrong or riskier: Report only the ratio and hide how it was achieved.. Why: Identical ratios can represent different strategies.SITUATIONRSI: Reactivestrength checkpointCORRECT / SAFERReport height and contact time beside the ratio.WRONG / RISKIERReport only the ratio and hide how it wasachieved.YESNO
Correct / safer

Report height and contact time beside the ratio.

Wrong / riskier

Report only the ratio and hide how it was achieved.

Transfer: Reactive strength checkpoint — Reactive rebound and sprint endurance are different constructs.
PWR-013 correct and incorrect comparison: Transfer: Reactive strength checkpointTransfer: Reactive strength checkpoint. Correct or safer: Call it performance in this rebound fixture.. Wrong or riskier: Use it as proof of sprint or repeated-sprint ability.. Why: Reactive rebound and sprint endurance are different constructs.SITUATIONTransfer: Reactivestrength checkpointCORRECT / SAFERCall it performance in this rebound fixture.WRONG / RISKIERUse it as proof of sprint or repeated-sprintability.YESNO
Correct / safer

Call it performance in this rebound fixture.

Wrong / riskier

Use it as proof of sprint or repeated-sprint ability.

Method-structure checklist

10 of 10 structural checks present

  • Ordered, Power-specific instructions — present
  • Every activity has a success check — present
  • Materials or supplied records are declared — present
  • Measurement or assessment rule is present — present
  • Tutorial-specific troubleshooting is present — present
  • Stopping or escalation boundary is present — present
  • Every activity has an adjacent alternative — present
  • Correct-versus-incorrect comparison is present — present
  • Evidence context is bound to the Power record — present
  • Planning metadata is present — present

The method-readiness band and presence checklist assess tutorial presentation and are separate from evidence quality for the underlying Power. They are automated editorial aids, not human approval.

Manual editorial sign-off: Pending. This tutorial must not display a human-approved state until an identified editor signs the exact content hash.