PWR-176 · Empathy, Social Cognition & Trust

Social memory

People can improve selected face–name memory, especially with mnemonic support; that is not perfect recognition or identity verification.

Revision 7T · Full Tutorial Edition · Release manifest · Methodology · Corrections

One source of teaching truth

Canonical Power learning unit · TLU-PWR-176

The learner recalls names and roles from a consented fictional set after a delay, marks uncertainty, checks against the source and reports both correct recalls and false alarms.

Canonical Power page
PWR-176 · Social memory
Full tutorial
Open full tutorial
Practical authority
The tutorial teaches a low-risk method that may be practised inside its stated limits.
Current treatment
Full low-stakes tutorial
Research depth
focused · 3 bound sources
Risk framing
moderate to high
Capability self-practice
Permitted inside the tutorial's stated low-risk limits
Pathway membership
G-CUR-019

Open My Power Path Inspect the canonical record

Read before using this page

Explanation is not permission.

This dossier explains the evidence and its limits. It is not a diagnosis, personal recommendation, assessment, clearance, performance promise or training programme. Actionable teaching appears only when the canonical Power record explicitly authorises it.

Complete bounded explanation

What this power means.

Capability to develop or express social memory in a declared context without inheriting broader claims.

What the current evidence supports

Face–name memory can improve with mnemonic support in selected clinical tasks, while acute high-intensity exercise did not improve the tested outcome.

How to observe or measure it without overclaiming

Declare material, familiarity, language, cue, assistance, accuracy, false alarms, confidence, delay and chosen real function; recognition confidence is not identity verification.

Myth

Never forget another face

Metric

Correct identification, false alarms and retained name/role recall after a declared delay

Boundary

A memory task cannot establish biometric identity, trustworthiness or universal face recognition.

Negative and limiting findings

  • High-intensity acute exercise produced no supported face–name benefit.
  • Task gains did not establish broad everyday social memory or freedom from false identification.

Claims this evidence cannot support

  • never forget a face
  • identify anyone instantly
  • super-recognizer training
  • exercise unlocks face memory
  • facial database for social skill

Individual tutorial · FULL SELF GUIDED TUTORIAL

How to learn this Power now.

The learner recalls names and roles from a consented fictional set after a delay, marks uncertainty, checks against the source and reports both correct recalls and false alarms.

  1. Get readyConfirm that every card is fictional or consented and set a deletion date.
  2. Learn the method8 concrete steps teach the permitted method from start to finish.
  3. See right and wrong4 comparisons show correct or safer execution beside common wrong or riskier choices.
  4. PractisePractise one six-card set twice per week for three weeks. Use a new set after 48 hours and a two-week check without the old cards; progress by reducing omissions while keeping false identifications at zero.
  5. Check progressBaseline fixture: Six fictional conference cards show a face illustration, first name, role and one public task: Lina–lighting, Omar–registration, Mei–audio, Tomas–catering, Asha–access, Ben–stage. Enter success checks from “Set the privacy rule” and “Correct from the card”. If “Store private details because they are memorable.” occurs, apply its named fix; then score Correct identification, false alarms and retained name/role recall after a declared delay on the unused “Test a new set” item.

Authority boundary: Titan teaches a concrete low-stakes method step by step while keeping evidence and transfer claims bounded. The method is Power-specific; its actionability follows this treatment.

Related Powers: PWR-169 · PWR-170 · PWR-171 · PWR-172

Direct evidence register

Sources that support—and limit—the claim.

Citation roles are explicit. A source may support existence or trainability while simultaneously limiting transfer, certainty, generalisation or safety.

  1. Limiting / contrary
    The Effects of High-Intensity Acute Exercise on Face-Name Memory in Healthy Young Adults

    Morgan Gilbert; Paul D. Loprinzi · 2022 · Primary research

  2. Primary empirical supportLimiting / contrary
    Training gains and transfer effects after mnemonic strategy training in mild cognitive impairment: A fMRI study

    Sharon S. Simon; Benjamin M. Hampstead; Mariana P. Nucci; Fábio L. S. Duran; Luciana M. Fonseca; Maria da Graça M. Martin; Renata Ávila; Fábio H. G. Porto; Sônia M. D. Brucki; Camila B. Martins; Lyssandra S. Tascone; Edson Amaro; Geraldo F. Busatto; Cássio M. C. Bottino · 2020 · Primary research

  3. Limiting / contraryOfficial boundary context
    Employment practices and data protection: monitoring workers

    Information Commissioner’s Office · 2023 · Official authority

Current teaching and evidence boundary

The next gate remains visible.

External confirmation is required before higher-authority use because: a clinical, high-risk or regulated configuration.

A Power-specific tutorial is available at /tutorials/pwr-176/. It contains a plain-English method, 8 ordered steps, a worked example, right-versus-wrong comparisons, specific mistakes and corrections, practice, measurement, accessibility, stopping rules and evidence. Its self guided mode remains controlling.