PWR-141 · Language, Explanation & Persuasion

Explanatory clarity

Teach-back can help test and improve understanding in configured settings, with limited evidence of one-month knowledge retention.

Read the complete explanationCompare the Frontier record

Revision 7T · Full Tutorial Edition · Release manifest · Methodology · Corrections

One source of teaching truth

Canonical Power learning unit · TLU-PWR-141

A defined novice accurately teaches back one benign concept and completes its simple action after one explanation revision.

Canonical Power page
PWR-141 · Explanatory clarity
Full tutorial
Open full tutorial
Practical authority
The tutorial teaches a low-risk method that may be practised inside its stated limits.
Current treatment
Full low-stakes tutorial
Research depth
focused · 3 bound sources
Risk framing
low to moderate
Capability self-practice
Permitted inside the tutorial's stated low-risk limits
Pathway membership
G-CUR-014

Open My Power Path Inspect the canonical record

Read before using this page

Explanation is not permission.

This dossier explains the evidence and its limits. It is not a diagnosis, personal recommendation, assessment, clearance, performance promise or training programme. Actionable teaching appears only when the canonical Power record explicitly authorises it.

Complete bounded explanation

What this power means.

Capability to develop or express explanatory clarity in a declared context without inheriting broader claims.

What the current evidence supports

Teach-back can help test and improve understanding in configured settings, with limited evidence of one-month knowledge retention.

How to observe or measure it without overclaiming

Accurate audience teach-back, error detection, action demonstration and delayed understanding using accessible mode. Audience change does not establish truth, consent, professional competence or ethical legitimacy.

Myth

A gifted explainer can make anyone understand anything once

Metric

Accurate audience teach-back, error detection, action demonstration and delayed understanding using accessible mode

Boundary

Accurate audience teach-back, error detection, action demonstration and delayed understanding using accessible mode. Audience change does not establish truth, consent, professional competence or ethical legitimacy.

Negative and limiting findings

  • The trial did not establish broad behaviour or cross-domain transfer and applied language eligibility restrictions.
  • No evidence supports perfect, limitless or universal performance.

Claims this evidence cannot support

  • If they repeat it, they fully understand
  • Simple language replaces informed consent
  • Teach-back tests intelligence or memory

Individual tutorial · FULL SELF GUIDED TUTORIAL

How to learn this Power now.

A defined novice accurately teaches back one benign concept and completes its simple action after one explanation revision.

  1. Get readyPrepare one benign concept with a simple action, explained to a consented novice in five minutes or less
  2. Learn the method7 concrete steps teach the permitted method from start to finish.
  3. See right and wrong5 comparisons show correct or safer execution beside common wrong or riskier choices.
  4. PractiseRepeat twice with a fresh consented novice and two supplied benign library concepts of similar complexity. First practise turning a vague impression into one observable action; next practise repairing one changed fact without restarting the whole explanation. Progress only when the novice passes the same teach-back rubric on an equivalent case after the targeted revision.
  5. Check progressFor Explanatory clarity, measure Accurate audience teach-back, error detection, action demonstration and delayed understanding using accessible mode. Keep the explanatory clarity fixture stable. Target: A defined novice accurately teaches back one benign concept and completes its simple action after one explanation revision. Log explanatory clarity errors, prompts, burden and stops.

Authority boundary: Titan teaches a concrete low-stakes method step by step while keeping evidence and transfer claims bounded. The method is Power-specific; its actionability follows this treatment.

Open the full tutorialOpen My Power Path

Related Powers: PWR-137 · PWR-138 · PWR-139 · PWR-140

Direct evidence register

Sources that support—and limit—the claim.

Citation roles are explicit. A source may support existence or trainability while simultaneously limiting transfer, certainty, generalisation or safety.

  1. Primary empirical supportLimiting / contrary
    'Teach-back' is a simple communication tool that improves disease knowledge in people with chronic hepatitis B - a pilot randomized controlled study

    Tran S; Bennett G; Richmond J; Nguyen T; Ryan M; Hong T; Howell J; Demediuk B; Desmond P; Bell S; Thompson A · 2019 · Primary research

  2. Limiting / contraryOfficial boundary context
    ADA Requirements: Effective Communication

    United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division · 2026 · Official authority

  3. Limiting / contraryOfficial boundary context
    Use the Teach-Back Method: Tool 5

    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality · 2024 · Official authority

Current teaching and evidence boundary

The next gate remains visible.

External confirmation is required before higher-authority use because: cultural, community-rights or affected-person authority.

A Power-specific tutorial is available at /tutorials/pwr-141/. It contains a plain-English method, 7 ordered steps, a worked example, right-versus-wrong comparisons, specific mistakes and corrections, practice, measurement, accessibility, stopping rules and evidence. Its self guided mode remains controlling.