Complete bounded explanation
What this power means.
Capability to develop or express multilingual comprehension in a declared context without inheriting broader claims.
What the current evidence supports
People can develop measurable components of additional-language comprehension, with some retained near transfer; whole-language proficiency requires broader criterion assessment.
How to observe or measure it without overclaiming
Predeclared criterion performance in reception, interaction and mediation across familiar and unfamiliar speakers/signers and contexts. Audience change does not establish truth, consent, professional competence or ethical legitimacy.
A trick unlocks effortless universal fluency
MetricPredeclared criterion performance in reception, interaction and mediation across familiar and unfamiliar speakers/signers and contexts
BoundaryPredeclared criterion performance in reception, interaction and mediation across familiar and unfamiliar speakers/signers and contexts. Audience change does not establish truth, consent, professional competence or ethical legitimacy.
Negative and limiting findings
- Phonetic transfer remained talker- and contrast-specific, and criterion frameworks do not themselves prove a training effect.
- No evidence supports perfect, limitless or universal performance.
Claims this evidence cannot support
- Become fluent instantly
- One accent is the correct measure of language ability
- Sign language is a substitute for spoken language