PWR-112 · Memory, Learning & Skill Acquisition

Reacquisition and reconsolidation

Relearning is real; claims that memories can be safely rewritten or erased are not established.

Read the complete explanationCompare the Frontier record

Revision 7T · Full Tutorial Edition · Release manifest · Methodology · Corrections

One source of teaching truth

Canonical Power learning unit · TLU-PWR-112

The learner completes a provider-run neutral symbol-key relearning task and correctly reports trials-to-criterion as reacquisition without claiming that reconsolidation occurred.

Canonical Power page
PWR-112 · Reacquisition and reconsolidation
Full tutorial
Open full tutorial
Practical authority
The tutorial teaches the complete method; qualified supervision controls the specified practical parts.
Current treatment
Full supervised tutorial
Research depth
detailed · 4 bound sources
Risk framing
high
Capability self-practice
Qualified supervision is required for the practical method
Pathway membership
G-CUR-010

Open My Power Path Inspect the canonical record

Read before using this page

Explanation is not permission.

This dossier explains the evidence and its limits. It is not a diagnosis, personal recommendation, assessment, clearance, performance promise or training programme. Actionable teaching appears only when the canonical Power record explicitly authorises it.

Complete bounded explanation

What this power means.

Capability to develop or express reacquisition and reconsolidation in a declared context without inheriting broader claims.

What the current evidence supports

Previously learned associations may sometimes be relearned more efficiently, while strong human reconsolidation-update claims remain conflicting.

How to observe or measure it without overclaiming

Separate reacquisition rate from reconsolidation mechanism; declare conditioning, retrieval timing, errors, physiological measure, follow-up and clinical relevance.

Myth

Rewrite or erase a memory

Metric

Reacquisition rate and predeclared return-of-response measures after delay

Boundary

Laboratory conditioning cannot establish trauma-memory erasure, historical truth or clinical benefit.

Negative and limiting findings

  • A high-powered registered replication found no persistent reactivation-extinction advantage.
  • Suggestive interviewing can create confident reports of fabricated events.

Claims this evidence cannot support

  • rewrite traumatic memories
  • erase fear
  • recover true hidden memories
  • reprogram the past

Individual tutorial · FULL SUPERVISED TUTORIAL

How to learn this Power now.

The learner completes a provider-run neutral symbol-key relearning task and correctly reports trials-to-criterion as reacquisition without claiming that reconsolidation occurred.

  1. Get readyConfirm that all stimuli are neutral and contain no personal, emotional, clinical or autobiographical content.
  2. Learn the method8 concrete steps teach the permitted method from start to finish.
  3. See right and wrong5 comparisons show correct or safer execution beside common wrong or riskier choices.
  4. PractiseThe provider runs one return session after the predeclared delay: one no-feedback probe followed by matched reacquisition to criterion/cap. Additional delays, reward conditions or reactivation manipulations require a new approved protocol; no personal-memory practice occurs.
  5. Check progressCompare blocks/trials to the same criterion under identical neutral mapping/feedback, retain a no-feedback retention probe, latency and errors, and predeclare any return-of-response measure.

Authority boundary: Titan teaches the complete method; a qualified person controls the parts that require supervision, clearance, specialist equipment, load, dose or progression. The method is Power-specific; its actionability follows this treatment.

Open the full tutorialOpen My Power Path

Related Powers: PWR-105 · PWR-106 · PWR-107 · PWR-108

Direct evidence register

Sources that support—and limit—the claim.

Citation roles are explicit. A source may support existence or trainability while simultaneously limiting transfer, certainty, generalisation or safety.

  1. Primary empirical supportLimiting / contrary
    No persistent attenuation of fear memories in humans: A registered replication of the reactivation-extinction effect

    Anastasia Chalkia; Natalie Schroyens; Lu Leng; Niels Vanhasbroeck; Ann-Kathrin Zenses; Lukas Van Oudenhove; Tom Beckers · 2020 · Primary research

  2. Primary empirical supportLimiting / contrary
    Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms

    Daniela Schiller; Marie-H. Monfils; Candace M. Raio; David C. Johnson; Joseph E. LeDoux; Elizabeth A. Phelps · 2009 · Primary research

  3. Primary empirical supportLimiting / contrary
    Reward-enhanced encoding improves relearning of forgotten associations

    Ewa A. Miendlarzewska; Sara Ciucci; Carlo V. Cannistraci; Daphne Bavelier; Sophie Schwartz · 2018 · Primary research

  4. Limiting / contrary
    Lost in the mall again: a preregistered replication and extension of Loftus & Pickrell (1995)

    Gillian Murphy; Caroline A. Dawson; Charlotte Huston; Lisa Ballantyne; Elizabeth Barrett; Conor S. Cowman; Christopher Fitzsimons; Julie Maher; Katie M. Ryan; Ciara M. Greene · 2023 · Primary research

Current teaching and evidence boundary

The next gate remains visible.

External confirmation is required before higher-authority use because: a clinical, high-risk or regulated configuration; a supervision or non-attempt boundary; cultural, community-rights or affected-person authority; a restricted safety or legitimacy boundary.

A Power-specific tutorial is available at /tutorials/pwr-112/. It contains a plain-English method, 8 ordered steps, a worked example, right-versus-wrong comparisons, specific mistakes and corrections, practice, measurement, accessibility, stopping rules and evidence. Its supervised mode remains controlling.