PWR-103 · Attention & Executive Control

Goal maintenance

External reminders can be part of a real capability. In one brain-injury trial, a cue-supported programme improved reported everyday function for six months; that result remains clinical and specific.

Read the complete explanationCompare the Frontier record

Revision 7T · Full Tutorial Edition · Release manifest · Methodology · Corrections

One source of teaching truth

Canonical Power learning unit · TLU-PWR-103

The learner completes a delayed fictional desk goal after a timer interruption and records whether the cue was detected, the goal retrieved, the action completed and which supports were used.

Canonical Power page
PWR-103 · Goal maintenance
Full tutorial
Open full tutorial
Practical authority
The tutorial teaches a low-risk method that may be practised inside its stated limits.
Current treatment
Full low-stakes tutorial
Research depth
focused · 3 bound sources
Risk framing
moderate to high
Capability self-practice
Permitted inside the tutorial's stated low-risk limits
Pathway membership
G-CUR-009

Open My Power Path Inspect the canonical record

Read before using this page

Explanation is not permission.

This dossier explains the evidence and its limits. It is not a diagnosis, personal recommendation, assessment, clearance, performance promise or training programme. Actionable teaching appears only when the canonical Power record explicitly authorises it.

Complete bounded explanation

What this power means.

Capability to develop or express goal maintenance in a declared context without inheriting broader claims.

What the current evidence supports

Goal-management rehabilitation with external cues can improve reported everyday function after acquired brain injury, but results do not generalize across clinical groups or prove unaided executive recovery.

How to observe or measure it without overclaiming

Goal completion, resumption error, assistance and personally meaningful participation must accompany self-report and task tests; support use is part of the result.

Myth

Install perfect follow-through

Metric

Meaningful goal completion and resumption with assistance recorded over time

Boundary

A supported clinical result cannot establish unaided executive recovery or a universal productivity system.

Negative and limiting findings

  • In depression, Goal Management Training did not outperform computerized cognitive training on any outcome; after brain injury, most neuropsychological tests improved in both groups.

Claims this evidence cannot support

  • Repair executive function yourself
  • Stop using reminders
  • One system treats brain injury and depression
  • Productivity proves recovery

Individual tutorial · FULL SELF GUIDED TUTORIAL

How to learn this Power now.

The learner completes a delayed fictional desk goal after a timer interruption and records whether the cue was detected, the goal retrieved, the action completed and which supports were used.

  1. Get readyChoose a fictional action whose failure has no consequence, such as moving a blue envelope to the OUT tray.
  2. Learn the method8 concrete steps teach the permitted method from start to finish.
  3. See right and wrong5 comparisons show correct or safer execution beside common wrong or riskier choices.
  4. PractisePractise three low-stakes trials across one week, each with one cue and 3–8 minutes of neutral filler. Keep the goal form and scoring rule; change only the fictional object after two successful trials. One week later, repeat without reviewing the earlier result, keeping the goal card available.
  5. Check progressFor each trial, record cue detection, retrieval, action, resumption, delay and every cue/card/person support; do not combine stages into one memory score.

Authority boundary: Titan teaches a concrete low-stakes method step by step while keeping evidence and transfer claims bounded. The method is Power-specific; its actionability follows this treatment.

Open the full tutorialOpen My Power Path

Related Powers: PWR-097 · PWR-098 · PWR-099 · PWR-100

Direct evidence register

Sources that support—and limit—the claim.

Citation roles are explicit. A source may support existence or trainability while simultaneously limiting transfer, certainty, generalisation or safety.

  1. Primary empirical supportLimiting / contrary
    Goal management training as a cognitive remediation intervention in depression: A randomized controlled trial

    Bjørn Ivar Hagen; Bjørn Lau; Jutta Joormann; Milada C Småstuen; Nils Inge Landrø; Jan Stubberud · 2020 · Primary research

  2. Primary empirical supportLimiting / contrary
    Rehabilitation of Executive Functions in Patients with Chronic Acquired Brain Injury with Goal Management Training, External Cuing, and Emotional Regulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Sveinung Tornås; Marianne Løvstad; Anne-Kristin Solbakk; Jonathan Evans; Tor Endestad; Per Kristian Hol; Anne-Kristine Schanke; Jan Stubberud · 2016 · Primary research

  3. Primary empirical supportLimiting / contrary
    Putting brain training to the test

    Adrian M Owen; Adam Hampshire; Jessica A Grahn; Robert Stenton; Said Dajani; Alistair S Burns; Robert J Howard; Clive G Ballard · 2010 · Primary research

Current teaching and evidence boundary

The next gate remains visible.

External confirmation is required before higher-authority use because: a clinical, high-risk or regulated configuration; a supervision or non-attempt boundary; a restricted safety or legitimacy boundary.

A Power-specific tutorial is available at /tutorials/pwr-103/. It contains a plain-English method, 8 ordered steps, a worked example, right-versus-wrong comparisons, specific mistakes and corrections, practice, measurement, accessibility, stopping rules and evidence. Its self guided mode remains controlling.