Skip to content
TITAN//CAPABILITY
Revision 7T · Full Tutorial Edition · Updated 1 September 2026

PWR-202 · SUPERVISED full tutorial

Learn a complete row-and-column sensory code on a nine-cell tabletop board

This specialist-led lesson teaches an exact tabletop code. One, two or three short vibrations mean top, middle or bottom row. After a one-second pause, one, two or three long vibrations mean left, centre or right column. The learner first practises the two components, sees one complete centre code, then decodes all eight other combined locations, traces a three-cell token path, refuses an incomplete signal and compares the coded channel with direct description. No standing or travel occurs.

What you will produceWith an assistive-technology professional, the learner records eight unlabelled combined location trials, completes one coded three-cell tabletop path, uses the fallback for an incomplete code and compares a mirrored path delivered by direct description.
Method8 numbered Power-specific steps
Practice authorityFull method with qualified supervision where stated

One source of teaching truth

Full step-by-step individual tutorial · TLU-PWR-202

With an assistive-technology professional, the learner records eight unlabelled combined location trials, completes one coded three-cell tabletop path, uses the fallback for an incomplete code and compares a mirrored path delivered by direct description.

Canonical Power page
PWR-202 · Sensory substitution
Full tutorial
Open full tutorial
Practical authority
The tutorial teaches the complete method; qualified supervision controls the specified practical parts.
Current treatment
Full supervised tutorial
Research depth
detailed · 4 bound sources
Risk framing
moderate to high clinical or mobility
Capability self-practice
Qualified supervision is required for the practical method
Pathway membership
Retained external route · SP-HUB-004

Open My Power Path Inspect the canonical record

1 · Permission and limits

Know exactly what you may do

You may

  • Choose whether to try the approved tabletop device and stop at any time.
  • Write or indicate ROW, COLUMN, MISSING, workload and preferred channel.
  • Retain direct description and ordinary assistive supports throughout.

Qualified help is required for

  • The specialist approves contact site, intensity, pulse lengths, one-second pause, device condition and stop signal.
  • The specialist controls all signals, hides the trainer strip, inspects skin and decides whether another session is appropriate.
  • Any standing, obstacle or mobility use requires a separate qualified programme and is not part of this lesson.

Never do this from the page alone

  • Change device intensity or contact position without the specialist.
  • Guess a cell when either half of the code is missing.
  • Use this tabletop result to replace a mobility aid or claim independent navigation.

2 · Get ready

Gather what you need and check the starting conditions

What you need

  • A non-slip raised 3-by-3 board labelled top/middle/bottom and left/centre/right.
  • An approved vibration band controlled by the assistive-technology professional, plus an independent spoken, signed or switch-accessible STOP signal.
  • The exact component map: 1 short vibration = top row; 2 short = middle row; 3 short = bottom row. After a one-second pause: 1 long vibration = left column; 2 long = centre column; 3 long = right column.
  • Two raised component strips, one for the three rows and one for the three columns, so components can be taught without revealing a complete board location.
  • Two foam tokens, a screen and a log with columns for actual cell, reported row, reported column, reversal, missing half-code, correct cell, seconds, workload 0–4, skin response and fallback.
  • Trainer-only eight-code strip, kept behind the screen: top-right, bottom-left, middle-right, top-left, bottom-centre, top-centre, bottom-right, middle-left.
  • Path A for vibration: top-left → middle-left → bottom-centre.
  • Path B for direct description: top-right → middle-right → bottom-centre.
  • Delayed Path C: bottom-left → middle-left → top-centre.
  • Delayed Path D: bottom-right → middle-right → top-centre.

Before you start

  • Remain seated at the non-slip table; this lesson contains no standing, obstacle or travel task.
  • The specialist checks skin, contact site, device battery, comfortable distinguishable pulse lengths and the independent STOP signal.
  • Place two boxes labelled ROW and COLUMN on the learner’s response sheet.
  • Keep direct description available as the fallback throughout.
  • End contact immediately for redness, pain, numbness, unusual sensation or increasing discomfort.

3 · The method

Follow these steps in order

  1. Learn the row component

    Using only the raised row strip, the specialist sends one, two and three short vibrations in labelled order. The learner touches or names top, middle and bottom after each signal.

    Why: Rows must be recognised before a two-part location can be decoded.

    Check: Top, middle and bottom are each identified correctly on three labelled demonstrations.

  2. Learn the column component

    Using only the raised column strip, the specialist sends one, two and three long vibrations in labelled order. The learner identifies left, centre and right.

    Why: Separating pulse length and position reduces row-column confusion.

    Check: Left, centre and right are each identified correctly on three labelled demonstrations.

  3. See one complete centre code

    The specialist demonstrates middle-centre once: two short vibrations, a one-second pause, then two long vibrations. The learner writes ROW = middle and COLUMN = centre before naming the cell.

    Why: One complete example teaches how the two components join while leaving the other eight combined codes unshown.

    Check: The learner explains that the first group always gives row and the second always gives column.

  4. Decode eight unlabelled combined codes

    Behind the screen, the specialist uses the exact trainer-only order: top-right, bottom-left, middle-right, top-left, bottom-centre, top-centre, bottom-right, middle-left. After every signal the learner fills ROW and COLUMN, commits a marker, then sees the token.

    Why: All eight non-centre combinations test whether familiar components can be joined without answer leakage.

    Check: Eight rows exist in the log, including every row error, column error, reversal, time and workload.

  5. Trace Path A with vibration

    Signal top-left, middle-left and bottom-centre in that order. The learner decodes each cell before sliding a second token to it. Correct an error before the next segment.

    Why: A sequence tests use of the code rather than isolated recognition alone.

    Check: The endpoint, component errors, corrections, seconds and workload are recorded.

  6. Stage one incomplete code

    Send a row group but deliberately omit the column group. The learner must write MISSING and request repetition or direct description.

    Why: A safe channel must expose dropouts instead of turning them into guesses.

    Check: No cell is named and the fallback is used.

  7. Complete Path B by direct description

    Through the learner’s normal accessible channel, say or indicate top-right, middle-right and bottom-centre. The learner traces the path while the trainer records endpoint, seconds and workload.

    Why: The familiar fallback supplies a practical comparator without pretending to be another mobility test.

    Check: Both path records contain the same outcome fields.

  8. Compare without overclaiming

    Compare component errors, endpoint, time, workload, skin response, fallback use and the learner’s provisional preference. Do not call one channel superior from this single order.

    Why: One short session contains learning and order effects.

    Check: The record states which channel the learner chooses now and that the delayed session reverses channel order.

4 · Worked example

See the whole method used once

Scenario

Sam remains seated at the board while an assistive-technology specialist controls an approved forearm band.

Walkthrough

  1. Sam learns the three short row signals on the row strip and the three long column signals on the column strip.
  2. The specialist demonstrates only middle-centre as a complete code.
  3. On the trainer-only eight-code strip, Sam records six correct cells, one row-column reversal and one wrong column.
  4. Sam traces vibration Path A, corrects the reversal before the second segment and reaches bottom-centre.
  5. When the specialist omits the column group, Sam writes MISSING and requests direct description instead of guessing.
  6. Sam completes direct-description Path B nine seconds faster with lower workload and chooses direct description for current use while agreeing to one delayed coded retest.

Result

Sam has produced an honest tabletop decoding record and used a safe fallback. The result is not mobility training, restored vision or evidence that the device should replace ordinary support.

5 · Right and wrong

Compare correct or safer execution with the common wrong version

Right and wrong comparison
MomentRight / saferWrong / riskierWhy it matters
Code orderWrite the short-vibration row first, wait through the pause, then write the long-vibration column.Add every vibration into one total.The same total can represent several different cells.
Test answerCommit ROW and COLUMN before the token is revealed.Use the trainer’s hand, voice or visible strip to infer the answer.Answer leakage can imitate learning.
Incomplete signalWrite MISSING and request repetition or direct description.Guess the absent column.Guessing hides device or transmission failure.
Channel comparisonCompare endpoint, component errors, time, workload, skin and preference.Declare vibration better because one isolated cell was correct.A useful channel must support the complete tabletop task at acceptable burden.
ScopeDescribe the result as seated nine-cell code learning.Call it independent navigation or restored vision.No standing, obstacle detection or travel was tested.

6 · Common mistakes

Spot the error and apply the correction

Common mistakes and corrections
MistakeFix
The learner combines all vibrations into one number.Fill separate ROW and COLUMN boxes before naming a cell.
The trainer reveals complete corner codes during component teaching.Teach rows and columns on separate strips and demonstrate only middle-centre as a full code.
The eight test cells are described as unseen even though complete codes were previously shown.Show only the centre combination; keep all eight non-centre combined codes unlabelled until testing.
A missing half-code receives a guessed answer.Give MISSING its own logged outcome and use the fallback.
One path order is treated as proof of channel superiority.Call the choice provisional and reverse channel order at the delayed session.

7 · Practice

Turn the steps into a usable skill

First session

  1. Confirm the seated-only boundary, contact check and independent stop signal.
  2. Teach all three row components on the row strip.
  3. Teach all three column components on the column strip.
  4. Demonstrate one complete centre code.
  5. Run the exact eight unlabelled combined codes behind the screen.
  6. Trace Path A with vibration and record every component and correction.
  7. Stage the missing-column signal and require MISSING or fallback.
  8. Trace Path B by direct description.
  9. Compare the two path records, inspect skin and record a provisional channel choice.

Repeat plan

After at least seven days, keep the same specialist-approved contact site, pulse map, table and log. Before reviewing the map, sample four shuffled non-centre combined codes. Then reverse channel order: complete delayed Path C by direct description first and delayed Path D by vibration second. Record delayed accuracy, endpoint, time, workload, skin and preference separately from the first session.

Progress when

  • Row and column are written separately before every cell name.
  • All eight immediate combined-code trials and four delayed trials have complete logs.
  • An incomplete code is never guessed.
  • Both immediate paths and both delayed paths have endpoint, time and workload records.
  • Skin remains unchanged and the learner freely chooses the coded channel, direct description or no further trial.

Do not progress when

  • Redness, pain, numbness, unusual sensation, increasing discomfort or a device warning appears.
  • Repeated row-column reversals continue or workload exceeds the agreed ceiling.
  • The learner or provider proposes standing, obstacle travel or removal of an established aid.

8 · Check the result

Measure what changed

Tabletop code accuracy, component error type, path endpoint, completion time, workload, skin response, fallback use and chosen channel.

How: Score the eight immediate combined-code trials, vibration Path A, the staged dropout and direct-description Path B. After at least seven days, score four shuffled codes plus Paths C and D in reversed channel order. Keep immediate and delayed records separate.

Good result: Every signal has separate row and column entries, incomplete codes are never guessed, all path endpoints and corrections are logged, skin remains unchanged and the learner can make an informed provisional channel choice.

This does not prove: It does not prove independent navigation, obstacle avoidance, restored vision, safe travel or superiority over an established assistive route.

Self-check

9 · Stop, adapt or get help

Keep the safety boundary practical

Stop and get help

Accessibility and adaptations

10 · Evidence and limits

Why these instructions are here

  1. primary research

    Sensory-substitution research supports testing specific configured tasks, but it does not validate this exact vibration map or a claim of restored vision.

    Navigation aid for blind persons by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution: a pilot study
  2. primary research

    Assistive-device performance can vary by obstacle and configuration; this supports retaining ordinary aids and keeping the present lesson at a tabletop.

    Blindness and the Reliability of Downwards Sensors to Avoid Obstacles: A Study with the EyeCane
  3. official guidance

    WHO and UNICEF place user goals, access, fitting, support and alternatives at the centre of assistive-technology provision.

    Global report on assistive technology

Limits

Open the complete canonical research register
  1. Primary empirical supportLimiting / contrary
    Navigation aid for blind persons by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution: a pilot study

    A. Neugebauer; K. Rifai; M. Getzlaff; S. Wahl · 2020 · Primary research

  2. Primary empirical supportLimiting / contrary
    Blindness and the Reliability of Downwards Sensors to Avoid Obstacles: A Study with the EyeCane

    M. Bleau; S. Paré; I. Djerourou; D. R. Chebat; R. Kupers; M. Ptito · 2021 · Primary research

  3. Primary empirical supportLimiting / contrary
    The Unfolding Space Glove: A Wearable Spatio-Visual to Haptic Sensory Substitution Device for Blind People

    Jakob Kilian; Alexander Neugebauer; Lasse Scherffig; Siegfried Wahl · 2022 · Primary research

  4. Limiting / contraryOfficial boundary context
    Global report on assistive technology

    World Health Organization; United Nations Children's Fund · 2022 · Official report

Read the complete evidence interpretation on the Power dossier.

Tutorial delivery controls

Learn, adapt, troubleshoot and resume

Estimated timeEstimated 13 min reading; practical time is provider-set
DifficultyIntermediate
EquipmentBasic stationery or digital tools
SpaceDesk / seated
Method qualityComprehensive10 of 10 structural checks present. Automated method-readiness band; human editorial sign-off is separate.
Evidence contextG4; Detailed research depthScientific support is evaluated separately from teaching-method structure.
Editorial reviewPending manual sign-offNo human approval is claimed until reviewer, date and content hash are recorded.
Your tutorial progress0 of 8 steps complete
0 of 8 steps complete
Download learner worksheet

Progress is saved only in this browser on this device.

Step-by-step learner mode

Each activity includes its success check, a nearby accessible alternative and an “I’m stuck” correction path. Alternatives preserve the target where possible; when they change the task, Titan labels them as related rather than equivalent.

01

Learn the row component

Using only the raised row strip, the specialist sends one, two and three short vibrations in labelled order. The learner touches or names top, middle and bottom after each signal.

Why this step exists

Rows must be recognised before a two-part location can be decoded.

Success check

Top, middle and bottom are each identified correctly on three labelled demonstrations.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “Using only the raised row strip, the specialist sends one, two and three short vibrations in labelled order. The learner touches or names top, middle and bottom after each signal.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: The result from “Using only the raised row strip, the specialist sends one, two and three short vibrations in labelled order. The learner touches or names top, middle and bottom after each signal.” does not yet meet this declared check: Top, middle and bottom are each identified correctly on three labelled demonstrations.

    Correction: Return to the start of “Learn the row component”, reduce complexity or pace, and repeat only the part needed to satisfy: “Top, middle and bottom are each identified correctly on three labelled demonstrations.”

Stop / get help: End contact immediately for redness, pain, numbness, unusual sensation or increasing discomfort.

02

Learn the column component

Using only the raised column strip, the specialist sends one, two and three long vibrations in labelled order. The learner identifies left, centre and right.

Why this step exists

Separating pulse length and position reduces row-column confusion.

Success check

Left, centre and right are each identified correctly on three labelled demonstrations.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “Using only the raised column strip, the specialist sends one, two and three long vibrations in labelled order. The learner identifies left, centre and right.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: The result from “Using only the raised column strip, the specialist sends one, two and three long vibrations in labelled order. The learner identifies left, centre and right.” does not yet meet this declared check: Left, centre and right are each identified correctly on three labelled demonstrations.

    Correction: Return to the start of “Learn the column component”, reduce complexity or pace, and repeat only the part needed to satisfy: “Left, centre and right are each identified correctly on three labelled demonstrations.”

Stop / get help: End contact immediately for redness, pain, numbness, unusual sensation or increasing discomfort.

03

See one complete centre code

The specialist demonstrates middle-centre once: two short vibrations, a one-second pause, then two long vibrations. The learner writes ROW = middle and COLUMN = centre before naming the cell.

Why this step exists

One complete example teaches how the two components join while leaving the other eight combined codes unshown.

Success check

The learner explains that the first group always gives row and the second always gives column.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “The specialist demonstrates middle-centre once: two short vibrations, a one-second pause, then two long vibrations. The learner writes ROW = middle and COLUMN = centre before naming the cell.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: The learner combines all vibrations into one number.

    Correction: Fill separate ROW and COLUMN boxes before naming a cell.

Stop / get help: End contact immediately for redness, pain, numbness, unusual sensation or increasing discomfort.

04

Decode eight unlabelled combined codes

Behind the screen, the specialist uses the exact trainer-only order: top-right, bottom-left, middle-right, top-left, bottom-centre, top-centre, bottom-right, middle-left. After every signal the learner fills ROW and COLUMN, commits a marker, then sees the token.

Why this step exists

All eight non-centre combinations test whether familiar components can be joined without answer leakage.

Success check

Eight rows exist in the log, including every row error, column error, reversal, time and workload.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “Behind the screen, the specialist uses the exact trainer-only order: top-right, bottom-left, middle-right, top-left, bottom-centre, top-centre, bottom-right, middle-left. After every signal the learner fills ROW and COLUMN, commits a marker, then sees the token.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: The trainer reveals complete corner codes during component teaching.

    Correction: Teach rows and columns on separate strips and demonstrate only middle-centre as a full code.

  2. Possible snag: The eight test cells are described as unseen even though complete codes were previously shown.

    Correction: Show only the centre combination; keep all eight non-centre combined codes unlabelled until testing.

Stop / get help: End contact immediately for redness, pain, numbness, unusual sensation or increasing discomfort.

05

Trace Path A with vibration

Signal top-left, middle-left and bottom-centre in that order. The learner decodes each cell before sliding a second token to it. Correct an error before the next segment.

Why this step exists

A sequence tests use of the code rather than isolated recognition alone.

Success check

The endpoint, component errors, corrections, seconds and workload are recorded.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “Signal top-left, middle-left and bottom-centre in that order. The learner decodes each cell before sliding a second token to it. Correct an error before the next segment.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: The result from “Signal top-left, middle-left and bottom-centre in that order. The learner decodes each cell before sliding a second token to it. Correct an error before the next segment.” does not yet meet this declared check: The endpoint, component errors, corrections, seconds and workload are recorded.

    Correction: Return to the start of “Trace Path A with vibration”, reduce complexity or pace, and repeat only the part needed to satisfy: “The endpoint, component errors, corrections, seconds and workload are recorded.”

Stop / get help: End contact immediately for redness, pain, numbness, unusual sensation or increasing discomfort.

06

Stage one incomplete code

Send a row group but deliberately omit the column group. The learner must write MISSING and request repetition or direct description.

Why this step exists

A safe channel must expose dropouts instead of turning them into guesses.

Success check

No cell is named and the fallback is used.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “Send a row group but deliberately omit the column group. The learner must write MISSING and request repetition or direct description.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: A missing half-code receives a guessed answer.

    Correction: Give MISSING its own logged outcome and use the fallback.

Stop / get help: End contact immediately for redness, pain, numbness, unusual sensation or increasing discomfort.

07

Complete Path B by direct description

Through the learner’s normal accessible channel, say or indicate top-right, middle-right and bottom-centre. The learner traces the path while the trainer records endpoint, seconds and workload.

Why this step exists

The familiar fallback supplies a practical comparator without pretending to be another mobility test.

Success check

Both path records contain the same outcome fields.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “Through the learner’s normal accessible channel, say or indicate top-right, middle-right and bottom-centre. The learner traces the path while the trainer records endpoint, seconds and workload.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: The result from “Through the learner’s normal accessible channel, say or indicate top-right, middle-right and bottom-centre. The learner traces the path while the trainer records endpoint, seconds and workload.” does not yet meet this declared check: Both path records contain the same outcome fields.

    Correction: Return to the start of “Complete Path B by direct description”, reduce complexity or pace, and repeat only the part needed to satisfy: “Both path records contain the same outcome fields.”

Stop / get help: End contact immediately for redness, pain, numbness, unusual sensation or increasing discomfort.

08

Compare without overclaiming

Compare component errors, endpoint, time, workload, skin response, fallback use and the learner’s provisional preference. Do not call one channel superior from this single order.

Why this step exists

One short session contains learning and order effects.

Success check

The record states which channel the learner chooses now and that the delayed session reverses channel order.

I’m stuck on this step

Reset: Re-read this authored instruction — “Compare component errors, endpoint, time, workload, skin response, fallback use and the learner’s provisional preference. Do not call one channel superior from this single order.” — and its success check, then attempt only this step.

  1. Possible snag: One path order is treated as proof of channel superiority.

    Correction: Call the choice provisional and reverse channel order at the delayed session.

Stop / get help: End contact immediately for redness, pain, numbness, unusual sensation or increasing discomfort.

Correct versus incorrect execution

These accessible process diagrams are built from the tutorial’s own right/wrong teaching. They are not anatomical illustrations and do not add technique beyond the canonical tutorial.

Code order — The same total can represent several different cells.
PWR-202 correct and incorrect comparison: Code orderCode order. Correct or safer: Write the short-vibration row first, wait through the pause, then write the long-vibration column.. Wrong or riskier: Add every vibration into one total.. Why: The same total can represent several different cells.SITUATIONCode orderCORRECT / SAFERWrite the short-vibration row first, waitthrough the pause, then write the long-vibrationcolumn.WRONG / RISKIERAdd every vibration into one total.YESNO
Correct / safer

Write the short-vibration row first, wait through the pause, then write the long-vibration column.

Wrong / riskier

Add every vibration into one total.

Test answer — Answer leakage can imitate learning.
PWR-202 correct and incorrect comparison: Test answerTest answer. Correct or safer: Commit ROW and COLUMN before the token is revealed.. Wrong or riskier: Use the trainer’s hand, voice or visible strip to infer the answer.. Why: Answer leakage can imitate learning.SITUATIONTest answerCORRECT / SAFERCommit ROW and COLUMN before the token isrevealed.WRONG / RISKIERUse the trainer’s hand, voice or visible stripto infer the answer.YESNO
Correct / safer

Commit ROW and COLUMN before the token is revealed.

Wrong / riskier

Use the trainer’s hand, voice or visible strip to infer the answer.

Incomplete signal — Guessing hides device or transmission failure.
PWR-202 correct and incorrect comparison: Incomplete signalIncomplete signal. Correct or safer: Write MISSING and request repetition or direct description.. Wrong or riskier: Guess the absent column.. Why: Guessing hides device or transmission failure.SITUATIONIncomplete signalCORRECT / SAFERWrite MISSING and request repetition or directdescription.WRONG / RISKIERGuess the absent column.YESNO
Correct / safer

Write MISSING and request repetition or direct description.

Wrong / riskier

Guess the absent column.

Channel comparison — A useful channel must support the complete tabletop task at acceptable burden.
PWR-202 correct and incorrect comparison: Channel comparisonChannel comparison. Correct or safer: Compare endpoint, component errors, time, workload, skin and preference.. Wrong or riskier: Declare vibration better because one isolated cell was correct.. Why: A useful channel must support the complete tabletop task at acceptable burden.SITUATIONChannel comparisonCORRECT / SAFERCompare endpoint, component errors, time,workload, skin and preference.WRONG / RISKIERDeclare vibration better because one isolatedcell was correct.YESNO
Correct / safer

Compare endpoint, component errors, time, workload, skin and preference.

Wrong / riskier

Declare vibration better because one isolated cell was correct.

Scope — No standing, obstacle detection or travel was tested.
PWR-202 correct and incorrect comparison: ScopeScope. Correct or safer: Describe the result as seated nine-cell code learning.. Wrong or riskier: Call it independent navigation or restored vision.. Why: No standing, obstacle detection or travel was tested.SITUATIONScopeCORRECT / SAFERDescribe the result as seated nine-cell codelearning.WRONG / RISKIERCall it independent navigation or restoredvision.YESNO
Correct / safer

Describe the result as seated nine-cell code learning.

Wrong / riskier

Call it independent navigation or restored vision.

Method-structure checklist

10 of 10 structural checks present

  • Ordered, Power-specific instructions — present
  • Every activity has a success check — present
  • Materials or supplied records are declared — present
  • Measurement or assessment rule is present — present
  • Tutorial-specific troubleshooting is present — present
  • Stopping or escalation boundary is present — present
  • Every activity has an adjacent alternative — present
  • Correct-versus-incorrect comparison is present — present
  • Evidence context is bound to the Power record — present
  • Planning metadata is present — present

The method-readiness band and presence checklist assess tutorial presentation and are separate from evidence quality for the underlying Power. They are automated editorial aids, not human approval.

Manual editorial sign-off: Pending. This tutorial must not display a human-approved state until an identified editor signs the exact content hash.