# PWR-241 — Value clarity: learner worksheet Release: Revision 7T · Full Tutorial Edition Estimated time: Estimated 27 min reading and worksheet pass Difficulty: Intermediate Equipment: Common household or practice equipment — A private low-stakes prompt: “Rest matters, but I keep adding optional tasks after my planned stop time.”; Value-source and behaviour table, facts/assumptions/values columns, two-option trade-off grid and review card.; A timer and 0–10 burden/fit ratings; no public sharing is required. Space: Room-scale practice space Automated structural checklist: 10 of 10 structural checks present Evidence quality/context: G2; Focused research depth Automated method-quality band: Comprehensive Method-rating basis: Structure coverage, instruction/check specificity, alternative distinctness, source troubleshooting, comparison depth and whether purpose/check fields are authored rather than derived. Editorial review: Pending manual editorial sign off ## Before you begin - [ ] I read the tutorial authority and stop conditions. - [ ] I have the required equipment/space or a declared accessible alternative. ## Canonical source context This lesson teaches decision-specific value clarity. You will name where a value comes from, translate broad words into behaviours and look-alikes, identify affected people, preserve competing values, separate facts from preferences, compare reversible options, take one small action and review whether it fitted. The exercise cannot discover correct or permanent values. Target outcome: The learner produces a one-page low-stakes decision map with two competing values, observable behaviours, affected interests, uncertainty, a reversible action and a scheduled review. ### Authority and setup conditions - Choose a reversible decision with no health, safety, legal, financial or relationship consequence. - Write who is affected and whose separate consent or authority would be needed. - Set the option to pause or retire before trying to resolve the conflict. ### Required or supplied materials - A private low-stakes prompt: “Rest matters, but I keep adding optional tasks after my planned stop time.” - Value-source and behaviour table, facts/assumptions/values columns, two-option trade-off grid and review card. - A timer and 0–10 burden/fit ratings; no public sharing is required. ## 1. Name the decision Write the exact low-stakes choice, timing and what is outside the exercise. Why: Values become useful when tied to a decision. Success check: The question has two or more real options and a safe no-action route. Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “Write the exact low-stakes choice, timing and what is outside the exercise.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “The question has two or more real options and a safe no-action route.” Do not convert the research task into capability practice. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## 2. Trace value sources For each value, mark personally endorsed, role-based, cultural/family, rights-based, imposed or uncertain; note who may interpret shared values. Why: Source awareness separates choice from pressure. Success check: No shared value is claimed as privately owned. Accessible alternative: Complete “For each value, mark personally endorsed, role-based, cultural/family, rights-based, imposed or uncertain; note who may interpret shared values.” in shorter passes, or use keyboard input, dictation or a support person, while preserving this success check: “No shared value is claimed as privately owned.” Keep the exercise private and offer a non-writing route such as sorting cards without requiring public disclosure. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## 3. Translate words into behaviours List three observable behaviours that could express each value and three look-alikes that might violate it. Why: Broad labels such as care or achievement can justify opposite acts. Success check: The behaviours are concrete enough to compare with action. Accessible alternative: A supported, seated, reduced-range or slower version of “List three observable behaviours that could express each value and three look-alikes that might violate it.” is equivalent only when it keeps the same trained or measured target, declared configuration and success check: “The behaviours are concrete enough to compare with action.” If any of those change, record it as a related alternative rather than an equivalent repetition. Alternative relationship: Conditional equivalence requires target and configuration check Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## 4. Map affected interests Name who benefits, bears cost, is absent and what is outside your authority; do not imagine their consent. Why: A personal choice can still affect others. Success check: The map distinguishes known input from guessed perspective. Accessible alternative: Complete “Name who benefits, bears cost, is absent and what is outside your authority; do not imagine their consent.” in shorter passes, or use keyboard input, dictation or a support person, while preserving this success check: “The map distinguishes known input from guessed perspective.” Allow uncertainty and extra time; do not equate verbal fluency with clarity. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## 5. Separate facts and values Put observed facts, predicted effects and chosen value judgements into three labelled columns. Why: A preference should not masquerade as evidence. Success check: Every reason is placed in the correct category or marked uncertain. Accessible alternative: Complete “Put observed facts, predicted effects and chosen value judgements into three labelled columns.” in shorter passes, or use keyboard input, dictation or a support person, while preserving this success check: “Every reason is placed in the correct category or marked uncertain.” Keep the exercise private and offer a non-writing route such as sorting cards without requiring public disclosure. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## 6. Preserve the trade-off For each option, write what each value protects and costs; allow two legitimate values to remain in tension. Why: Clarity does not require eliminating conflict. Success check: The record does not turn one value into a universal winner. Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “For each option, write what each value protects and costs; allow two legitimate values to remain in tension.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “The record does not turn one value into a universal winner.” Do not convert the research task into capability practice. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## 7. Choose a small reversible action Select one low-burden action for one occurrence and state the stop condition. Why: A reversible trial supplies information without a life contract. Success check: The action can be undone and affects only the declared decision. Accessible alternative: Complete “Select one low-burden action for one occurrence and state the stop condition.” in shorter passes, or use keyboard input, dictation or a support person, while preserving this success check: “The action can be undone and affects only the declared decision.” Allow uncertainty and extra time; do not equate verbal fluency with clarity. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## 8. Review fit rather than virtue After the occurrence, record what happened, burden, affected-person feedback if legitimately available and whether to keep, adapt or retire. Why: Outcome and context are more informative than self-judgement. Success check: The conclusion uses evidence from the action, not character labels. Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “After the occurrence, record what happened, burden, affected-person feedback if legitimately available and whether to keep, adapt or retire.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “The conclusion uses evidence from the action, not character labels.” Do not convert the research task into capability practice. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## Reflection What changed? ________________________________________________________________________________ What remains difficult? ________________________________________________________________________________ What will I repeat, adapt, ask for help with, or stop? ________________________________________________________________________________ --- Completion of this worksheet demonstrates tutorial participation only. It does not establish capability, qualification, safety clearance, diagnosis, treatment or independent validation.