# PWR-222 — Cognitive offloading: learner worksheet

Release: Revision 7T · Full Tutorial Edition
Estimated time: Estimated 26 min reading and worksheet pass
Difficulty: Intermediate
Equipment: Common household or practice equipment — Three supplied matched six-item lists and their object cards. List A: notebook, pencil, name card, water bottle, charger card, agenda card. List B: folder, pen, badge, water cup, cable card, schedule card. List C: writing pad, marker, pass, flask, adapter card, programme card. A deliberate ambiguous replacement card says 'power item'; the dated source list resolves it to 'charger card'.; A paper or local private checklist with tick boxes and one deliberate ambiguous-cue card.; Timer, miss/duplicate log, checking count and burden scale.
Space: Room-scale practice space

Automated structural checklist: 10 of 10 structural checks present
Evidence quality/context: G1; Detailed research depth
Automated method-quality band: Comprehensive
Method-rating basis: Structure coverage, instruction/check specificity, alternative distinctness, source troubleshooting, comparison depth and whether purpose/check fields are authored rather than derived.

Editorial review: Pending manual editorial sign off

## Before you begin
- [ ] I read the tutorial authority and stop conditions.
- [ ] I have the required equipment/space or a declared accessible alternative.

## Canonical source context

This lesson teaches deliberate cognitive offloading. You will decide what may be delegated to a checklist or reminder, capture an unaided baseline, design a clear cue, test normal use and one failure, then run a delayed support-off comparison. The aim is reliable configured performance, not maximum device dependence or forced unaided memory.

Target outcome: The learner completes a six-item fictional packing task with a checklist, records misses and checking burden, recovers from one cue failure and reports delayed unaided recall separately.

### Authority and setup conditions

- Choose a task where a miss has no real consequence; never use medicines, appointments, appliances or emergency items.
- Decide which outcome matters: complete packing, later recall, or both; keep the scores separate.
- Set a manual fallback and the rule that ambiguous or stale cues are checked before action.

### Required or supplied materials

- Three supplied matched six-item lists and their object cards. List A: notebook, pencil, name card, water bottle, charger card, agenda card. List B: folder, pen, badge, water cup, cable card, schedule card. List C: writing pad, marker, pass, flask, adapter card, programme card. A deliberate ambiguous replacement card says 'power item'; the dated source list resolves it to 'charger card'.
- A paper or local private checklist with tick boxes and one deliberate ambiguous-cue card.
- Timer, miss/duplicate log, checking count and burden scale.

## 1. Split access from learning

Mark each item as safe to offload, important to remember without support, or requiring verified lookup.

Why: Different information has different failure consequences.

Success check: Every item has a justified memory route.

Accessible alternative: Replace small or visual-only information with enlarged text, high-contrast display, spoken description or tactile/verbal cueing while preserving the same decision and success check. Reduce the list length and group items by location without changing the completeness rule.

Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## 2. Capture unaided baseline

Read list A once, hide it and pack from memory without prompts; record correct, missed, duplicate and extra items.

Why: The baseline shows what the tool changes.

Success check: The raw unaided attempt remains visible.

Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “Read list A once, hide it and pack from memory without prompts; record correct, missed, duplicate and extra items.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “The raw unaided attempt remains visible.” Do not convert the research task into capability practice.

Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## 3. Build a clear checklist

Write one concrete noun per line, add a final completeness check and place the list where the task begins.

Why: A vague or invisible cue creates checking work instead of reducing it.

Success check: Another reader can identify and tick every item without interpretation.

Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “Write one concrete noun per line, add a final completeness check and place the list where the task begins.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “Another reader can identify and tick every item without interpretation.” Do not convert the research task into capability practice.

Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## 4. Run the tool-on task

Pack matched list B while ticking only after each item is placed; record time, misses and number of look-backs.

Why: Ticking only after placement prevents a mark from masquerading as completed packing.

Success check: Every tick corresponds to an item physically present.

Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “Pack matched list B while ticking only after each item is placed; record time, misses and number of look-backs.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “Every tick corresponds to an item physically present.” Do not convert the research task into capability practice.

Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## 5. Introduce one safe failure

Replace one line with an ambiguous label or make the paper briefly unavailable, then use the preplanned verified lookup or spare copy.

Why: Offloading capability includes recovering when the support fails.

Success check: The learner pauses, verifies and completes without guessing.

Accessible alternative: Replace small or visual-only information with enlarged text, high-contrast display, spoken description or tactile/verbal cueing while preserving the same decision and success check. Keep a needed aid during real tasks; support-off testing is optional and limited to harmless material.

Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## 6. Check for stale or duplicate cues

Compare list date/version with the task and scan for repeated or superseded lines before finalising.

Why: An old checklist can reliably produce the wrong task.

Success check: The used list is current and no duplicate action is hidden.

Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “Compare list date/version with the task and scan for repeated or superseded lines before finalising.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “The used list is current and no duplicate action is hidden.” Do not convert the research task into capability practice.

Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## 7. Run delayed support-off recall

After at least 48 hours, recall a matched six-item list without the old checklist and score it separately.

Why: Tool-on benefit can coexist with weaker learning of offloaded content.

Success check: Delayed unaided recall is never folded into tool-on completion.

Accessible alternative: Complete “After at least 48 hours, recall a matched six-item list without the old checklist and score it separately.” in shorter passes, or use keyboard input, dictation or a support person, while preserving this success check: “Delayed unaided recall is never folded into tool-on completion.” Reduce the list length and group items by location without changing the completeness rule.

Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## 8. Choose the right allocation

Keep, revise or retire the aid based on completion, burden, fallback and whether unaided recall matters for this task.

Why: The goal is fit, not maximum offloading.

Success check: The decision names the task elements that remain internal, external or verified.

Accessible alternative: Complete “Keep, revise or retire the aid based on completion, burden, fallback and whether unaided recall matters for this task.” in shorter passes, or use keyboard input, dictation or a support person, while preserving this success check: “The decision names the task elements that remain internal, external or verified.” Keep a needed aid during real tasks; support-off testing is optional and limited to harmless material.

Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## Reflection

What changed?

________________________________________________________________________________

What remains difficult?

________________________________________________________________________________

What will I repeat, adapt, ask for help with, or stop?

________________________________________________________________________________

---
Completion of this worksheet demonstrates tutorial participation only. It does not establish capability, qualification, safety clearance, diagnosis, treatment or independent validation.
