# PWR-180 — Cooperative problem solving: learner worksheet Release: Revision 7T · Full Tutorial Edition Estimated time: Estimated 18 min reading and worksheet pass Difficulty: Introductory Equipment: Common household or practice equipment — The fictional rights card: step-free access and a live remote-text route are requirements; budget is at most £50; duration is at most 60 minutes; no-decision remains valid; The four option records below; An audit sheet with affected roles, rights, constraints, unknowns, provenance, dissent, owner, review and fallback; The staged answer key, kept closed until every option has been audited Space: Desk / seated Automated structural checklist: 10 of 10 structural checks present Evidence quality/context: G2; Focused research depth Automated method-quality band: Established Method-rating basis: Structure coverage, instruction/check specificity, alternative distinctness, source troubleshooting, comparison depth and whether purpose/check fields are authored rather than derived. Editorial review: Pending manual editorial sign off ## Before you begin - [ ] I read the tutorial authority and stop conditions. - [ ] I have the required equipment/space or a declared accessible alternative. ## Canonical source context This tutorial teaches a complete decision-audit method using a finished fictional club-planning packet. You will identify who is affected, separate non-negotiable rights from preferences, test four options against access and resource constraints, preserve authorship and dissent, mark unknowns and choose a reversible decision or a legitimate no-decision. You will not convene a real group, collect access disclosures or make a live rights-affecting decision. Target outcome: Define cooperative problem solving without inheriting mythology or broader claims. Explain what the current evidence supports and what it does not establish. Use the declared measurement boundary and recognise misleading proxies. Complete the current learning route without converting it into unauthorised capability practice. Make a retention, transfer, maintenance, provider or stop decision without overclaiming. ### Authority and setup conditions - Governance ceiling: explanation and static fictional record analysis only. Capability self-practice, live administration, protocol delivery and efficacy claims are not authorised until the recorded next_gate adjudication changes. - Use only the supplied fictional club packet. Do not convene a live group, collect access disclosures or substitute a real rights-affecting dispute. - The audit cannot confer implementation authority, represent an affected community or override consent, access, dissent or accountable process. ### Required or supplied materials - The fictional rights card: step-free access and a live remote-text route are requirements; budget is at most £50; duration is at most 60 minutes; no-decision remains valid - The four option records below - An audit sheet with affected roles, rights, constraints, unknowns, provenance, dissent, owner, review and fallback - The staged answer key, kept closed until every option has been audited ### Supplied fixture Fictional club options. Complete the rights/access audit before opening the staged evaluation key. | Option and author | Fictional data | | --- | --- | | A — garden sketch walk, Mira | £30; 60 minutes; ground-level paved route; quiet break; paper kits; remote participant receives photos only after the event | | B — upstairs ceramics demo, Jon | £55; 60 minutes; stairs only; hands-on clay; no remote channel; facilitator available for 40 minutes | | C — hybrid tabletop story lab, Sam | £45; 55 minutes; ground-floor room; live remote text board; quiet side table; materials posted in advance; moderator named for first 40 minutes only | | D — postpone and request venue information, shared fallback | £0 now; no activity chosen; fictional owner contacts two accessible venues and reports next week | ## 1. Write STATIC FICTIONAL DECISION AUDIT Write STATIC FICTIONAL DECISION AUDIT. Do not ask anyone to reveal a real access need or negotiate a live outcome. Why: “Write STATIC FICTIONAL DECISION AUDIT” keeps this lesson inside its declared record-analysis boundary and prevents the supplied scenario from being mistaken for physical practice. Success check: A legible entry directly completes “Write STATIC FICTIONAL DECISION AUDIT” and records the requested condition, decision or boundary without adding a new claim. Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “Write STATIC FICTIONAL DECISION AUDIT. Do not ask anyone to reveal a real access need or negotiate a live outcome.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “A legible entry directly completes “Write STATIC FICTIONAL DECISION AUDIT” and records the requested condition, decision or boundary without adding a new claim.” Do not convert the research task into capability practice. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## 2. Copy the decision rule before reading preferences Copy the decision rule before reading preferences. Mark step-free access, live remote text, £50 and 60 minutes as constraints rather than weighted preferences. Why: “Copy the decision rule before reading preferences” creates the auditable value, condition or statement needed for the tutorial’s later comparison and conclusion. Success check: A legible entry directly completes “Copy the decision rule before reading preferences” and records the requested condition, decision or boundary without adding a new claim. Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “Copy the decision rule before reading preferences. Mark step-free access, live remote text, £50 and 60 minutes as constraints rather than weighted preferences.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “A legible entry directly completes “Copy the decision rule before reading preferences” and records the requested condition, decision or boundary without adding a new claim.” Do not convert the research task into capability practice. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## 3. Name the affected fictional roles and what each controls Name the affected fictional roles and what each controls. Preserve the author attached to every option. Why: “Name the affected fictional roles and what each controls” keeps this lesson inside its declared record-analysis boundary and prevents the supplied scenario from being mistaken for physical practice. Success check: Evidence of completion shows the learner followed this exact instruction without adding an unstated step: “Name the affected fictional roles and what each controls. Preserve the author attached to every option.” Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “Name the affected fictional roles and what each controls. Preserve the author attached to every option.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “Evidence of completion shows the learner followed this exact instruction without adding an unstated step: “Name the affected fictional roles and what each controls. Preserve the author attached to every option.”” Do not convert the research task into capability practice. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## 4. Test each option against every constraint Test each option against every constraint. Write PASS, FAIL or UNKNOWN and cite the supplied fact; do not repair missing data by guessing. Why: “Test each option against every constraint” creates the auditable value, condition or statement needed for the tutorial’s later comparison and conclusion. Success check: A legible entry directly completes “Test each option against every constraint” and records the requested condition, decision or boundary without adding a new claim. Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “Test each option against every constraint. Write PASS, FAIL or UNKNOWN and cite the supplied fact; do not repair missing data by guessing.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “A legible entry directly completes “Test each option against every constraint” and records the requested condition, decision or boundary without adding a new claim.” Do not convert the research task into capability practice. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## 5. Record dissent and useful preferences even when an option fails Record dissent and useful preferences even when an option fails. Excluding an option is not permission to erase its author or concern. Why: “Record dissent and useful preferences even when an option fails” creates the auditable value, condition or statement needed for the tutorial’s later comparison and conclusion. Success check: A legible entry directly completes “Record dissent and useful preferences even when an option fails” and records the requested condition, decision or boundary without adding a new claim. Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “Record dissent and useful preferences even when an option fails. Excluding an option is not permission to erase its author or concern.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “A legible entry directly completes “Record dissent and useful preferences even when an option fails” and records the requested condition, decision or boundary without adding a new claim.” Do not convert the research task into capability practice. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## 6. For any conditionally eligible option, require an owner, review point and fallback For any conditionally eligible option, require an owner, review point and fallback. If one is absent, mark the choice conditional or choose no decision. Why: “For any conditionally eligible option, require an owner, review point and fallback” fixes the exact Cooperative problem solving configuration or decision before later observations are compared. Success check: The output directly answers “For any conditionally eligible option, require an owner, review point and fallback”, names the relevant distinction and stays within the supplied record. Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “For any conditionally eligible option, require an owner, review point and fallback. If one is absent, mark the choice conditional or choose no decision.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “The output directly answers “For any conditionally eligible option, require an owner, review point and fallback”, names the relevant distinction and stays within the supplied record.” Do not convert the research task into capability practice. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## 7. Select, revise, exclude or defer each option, then write one reversible fictional… Select, revise, exclude or defer each option, then write one reversible fictional decision. Agreement earns no extra credit. Why: “Select, revise, exclude or defer each option, then write one reversible fictional decision” keeps this lesson inside its declared record-analysis boundary and prevents the supplied scenario from being mistaken for physical practice. Success check: A legible entry directly completes “Select, revise, exclude or defer each option, then write one reversible fictional decision” and records the requested condition, decision or boundary without adding a new claim. Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “Select, revise, exclude or defer each option, then write one reversible fictional decision. Agreement earns no extra credit.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “A legible entry directly completes “Select, revise, exclude or defer each option, then write one reversible fictional decision” and records the requested condition, decision or boundary without adding a new claim.” Do not convert the research task into capability practice. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## 8. Finish with the boundary: this record does not authorise implementation or represent… Finish with the boundary: this record does not authorise implementation or represent the affected real-world community. Why: “Finish with the boundary: this record does not authorise implementation or represent the affected real-world community” creates the auditable value, condition or statement needed for the tutorial’s later comparison and conclusion. Success check: A legible entry directly completes “Finish with the boundary: this record does not authorise implementation or represent the affected real-world community” and records the requested condition, decision or boundary without adding a new claim. Accessible alternative: Complete the same research action — “Finish with the boundary: this record does not authorise implementation or represent the affected real-world community.” — using speech-to-text, text-to-speech, enlarged text, keyboard-only navigation, shorter work blocks or a support person. Preserve this declared check: “A legible entry directly completes “Finish with the boundary: this record does not authorise implementation or represent the affected real-world community” and records the requested condition, decision or boundary without adding a new claim.” Do not convert the research task into capability practice. Alternative relationship: Target preserving when declared check is preserved Learner notes: ________________________________________________________________________________ Completed: [ ] ## Reflection What changed? ________________________________________________________________________________ What remains difficult? ________________________________________________________________________________ What will I repeat, adapt, ask for help with, or stop? ________________________________________________________________________________ --- Completion of this worksheet demonstrates tutorial participation only. It does not establish capability, qualification, safety clearance, diagnosis, treatment or independent validation.