# PWR-166 — Mood stabilisation: learner worksheet

Release: Revision 7T · Full Tutorial Edition
Estimated time: Estimated 13 min reading; practical time is provider-set
Difficulty: Intermediate
Equipment: Basic stationery or digital tools — a clinician-reviewed mood and function pattern log.; The clinician’s care plan, personalised early-warning list, crisis contacts and medication instructions.; A daily log with mood range, sleep start/end, activity, function, medication taken as prescribed, substance changes and significant events.
Space: Desk / seated

Automated structural checklist: 10 of 10 structural checks present
Evidence quality/context: G4; Deep research depth
Automated method-quality band: Comprehensive
Method-rating basis: Structure coverage, instruction/check specificity, alternative distinctness, source troubleshooting, comparison depth and whether purpose/check fields are authored rather than derived.

Editorial review: Pending manual editorial sign off

## Before you begin
- [ ] I read the tutorial authority and stop conditions.
- [ ] I have the required equipment/space or a declared accessible alternative.

## Canonical source context

This lesson teaches the learner’s part of a clinician-led mood-stability plan: record mood with sleep, activity, function, medication adherence and warning signs; keep routines within the agreed range; use the written response ladder; and review patterns without changing treatment alone. It does not teach self-diagnosis or self-medication.

Target outcome: For fourteen days, the learner completes the agreed daily pattern log and follows the clinician-approved response ladder for any warning sign without changing medication or sleep intentionally.

### Authority and setup conditions

- Prepare a clinician-reviewed two-week mood, sleep, activity, function and warning-sign log tied to an individual care plan
- Before the first mood stabilisation attempt, write the exact result you will score: Clinically assessed episode course, function and harms within an individualized care system.
- The clinician confirms diagnosis, current episode status, medication plan, privacy, monitoring burden and who reviews data.
- Write thresholds for routine contact, same-day contact and emergency action before logging starts.

### Required or supplied materials

- a clinician-reviewed mood and function pattern log.
- The clinician’s care plan, personalised early-warning list, crisis contacts and medication instructions.
- A daily log with mood range, sleep start/end, activity, function, medication taken as prescribed, substance changes and significant events.

## 1. Write the response ladder

With the clinician, list green routine signs, amber early warnings, red urgent signs and the exact person/action for each level.

Why: A pre-agreed ladder turns monitoring into timely action rather than passive data collection.

Success check: Every level names observable signs, contact and timing.

Accessible alternative: Ask the qualified provider to adapt positioning, cue modality, pace, interface or rest while preserving this step’s declared check: “Every level names observable signs, contact and timing.” If an adaptation changes the measured task or configuration, record it as a different configuration rather than an equivalent attempt.

Alternative relationship: Conditional equivalence requires target and configuration check

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## 2. Set one daily check time

Choose a regular time that does not disrupt sleep. Keep the check under five minutes.

Why: Consistent brief sampling improves comparability and limits rumination.

Success check: The log is completed once daily at the declared time.

Accessible alternative: Ask the qualified provider to adapt positioning, cue modality, pace, interface or rest while preserving this step’s declared check: “The log is completed once daily at the declared time.” If an adaptation changes the measured task or configuration, record it as a different configuration rather than an equivalent attempt.

Alternative relationship: Conditional equivalence requires target and configuration check

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## 3. Record sleep and routine first

Enter sleep start, wake time, awakenings, meals, medication as prescribed and major routine changes before rating mood.

Why: Sleep and routine changes can be important warning context and should not be reconstructed from mood alone.

Success check: Objective routine fields are complete before the mood field.

Accessible alternative: Ask the qualified provider to adapt positioning, cue modality, pace, interface or rest while preserving this step’s declared check: “Objective routine fields are complete before the mood field.” If an adaptation changes the measured task or configuration, record it as a different configuration rather than an equivalent attempt.

Alternative relationship: Conditional equivalence requires target and configuration check

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## 4. Rate mood and activation separately

Use the clinician’s scales for low mood and activation/energy; add irritability or anxiety only if the plan includes them.

Why: High activation and low mood can coexist and require separate visibility.

Success check: Each planned dimension has its own value and no average “mood score.”

Accessible alternative: Ask the qualified provider to adapt positioning, cue modality, pace, interface or rest while preserving this step’s declared check: “Each planned dimension has its own value and no average “mood score.”” If an adaptation changes the measured task or configuration, record it as a different configuration rather than an equivalent attempt.

Alternative relationship: Conditional equivalence requires target and configuration check

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## 5. Add function and observable signs

Record one concrete function result and any personalised warning sign, such as missed work, rapid speech or unusual spending urge.

Why: Observable function and behaviour make a rating more interpretable.

Success check: Every day includes one function item and explicit yes/no warning signs.

Accessible alternative: Ask the qualified provider to adapt positioning, cue modality, pace, interface or rest while preserving this step’s declared check: “Every day includes one function item and explicit yes/no warning signs.” If an adaptation changes the measured task or configuration, record it as a different configuration rather than an equivalent attempt.

Alternative relationship: Conditional equivalence requires target and configuration check

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## 6. Apply the ladder that day

Compare the entry with the thresholds. Follow the contact or emergency action immediately; do not wait for a trend when a red sign appears.

Why: Some signs require action before a pattern is statistically clear.

Success check: The log records what action was taken and when.

Accessible alternative: Ask the qualified provider to adapt positioning, cue modality, pace, interface or rest while preserving this step’s declared check: “The log records what action was taken and when.” If an adaptation changes the measured task or configuration, record it as a different configuration rather than an equivalent attempt.

Alternative relationship: Conditional equivalence requires target and configuration check

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## 7. Keep treatment unchanged unless directed

Continue medication, sleep and routine exactly as prescribed while awaiting advice. Record deviations honestly.

Why: Independent changes can worsen risk and make the pattern uninterpretable.

Success check: No treatment change occurs without attributable clinical direction.

Accessible alternative: Ask the qualified provider to adapt positioning, cue modality, pace, interface or rest while preserving this step’s declared check: “No treatment change occurs without attributable clinical direction.” If an adaptation changes the measured task or configuration, record it as a different configuration rather than an equivalent attempt.

Alternative relationship: Conditional equivalence requires target and configuration check

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## 8. Review patterns with the clinician

At the agreed review, look for sequences across sleep, activation, function and events. Keep contradictory days and missing data visible.

Why: A clinician interprets the pattern in context; selective charts can mislead.

Success check: The review produces a documented keep, adapt or urgent-care decision.

Accessible alternative: Ask the qualified provider to adapt positioning, cue modality, pace, interface or rest while preserving this step’s declared check: “The review produces a documented keep, adapt or urgent-care decision.” If an adaptation changes the measured task or configuration, record it as a different configuration rather than an equivalent attempt.

Alternative relationship: Conditional equivalence requires target and configuration check

Learner notes:

________________________________________________________________________________

Completed: [ ]

## Reflection

What changed?

________________________________________________________________________________

What remains difficult?

________________________________________________________________________________

What will I repeat, adapt, ask for help with, or stop?

________________________________________________________________________________

---
Completion of this worksheet demonstrates tutorial participation only. It does not establish capability, qualification, safety clearance, diagnosis, treatment or independent validation.
